THEORY OF CREATION

My theory of creation is that everything should be in accordance with the statement:

WYSIWYG, if (as the bible says) God created each and every basic species (barimin) to reproduce after its own kind, finished creation after six days, and Noah's flood happened as described.

Explanation:
What you should see therefore is all life, plant and animal, was created at the start, ie: suddenly millions of separate species with no precursors to show what they could have developed from. Not everything will be found in the earliest fossil beds, but may yet be found there, but by chance some may not have been fossilized until much later. The more mobile, and more intelligent are more likely to have escaped the earlier stages of major floods, perhaps by making to higher ground, and be buried at the top, or be insufficiently covered, and therefor more likely to decay and not be fossilized. Also by being buried later in the flood the remains are more likely to be re-worked by later ebb and flow of what could be massive ocean currents prompted by seismic activity, since the "great deep" broke up, whereas the initial deposits were less likely to be re-worked, having been covered over. Shellfish and bottom feeders are most likely to be buried at the bottom, being overcome by silt and debris, and could be buried long before land creatures were overcome, and washed to the area.

You should not see any intermediates, or a succession of small developmental steps showing evolution towards higher forms of the species, or into another species. Because of genetic errors there will be a degrading of species, branching into subspecies that have lost some aspect, such as the ability to fly, but still have rudimentary wings. Dogs breed dogs and cats breed cats, but there is no evolutionary path of modifications between them, or from a common ancestor, in spite of similarities, such as four legs, head and tail. Some species may split into several species, the aurochs being an example, as it is believed to be the ancestor of all domestic cattle. It may have descended from a common ancestor to the water buffaloes and bison. This is in the pattern called "creationist orchard". *1 Some species will have been lost because of genetic errors, or changes in the environment, or being overcome by predators.

Heavy floods, particularly one detailed as Noah's flood would create and rework many fossil beds, and leave deposits stretched over thousands of miles. Because of the distances covered and the massive amount of water involved, deposits were often sorted into various grades and deposited over hundreds of miles, sometimes hundreds of feet thick of each grade. Sometimes with fossils, and sometimes just a particular grade of clay or sand. The fountains of the great deep broke up causing volcanism and earthquakes which would eventually push up some areas as land and some into mountains, which commonly have seashells and flood deposits on top.
Some areas have sunk down to create areas of deep sea. The volcanism would have created great heat, warming the sea and causing greater evaporation which could form ice and snow at the poles, bringing on the ice age. Much scientific work has been done on subduction where large surface masses have cooled down, or were cold, being more dense than the underlying material ("fountains of the great deep" indicate great amounts of water were beneath the crust of the earth, which would readily allow denser land material to sink) and because seismic actively enabled rifts to form the whole mass perhaps hundreds of square miles could take a rapid dive down, possibly exceeding a hundred miles an hour as it slid under.
Ancient records show that many tropical areas such as the Sahara Desert were fertile, and so there is a long history of the world warming up and the ice receding, it is not due to us polluting the atmosphere, though this may have a slight effect, but we cannot stop the global warming.

What is found.
What you do see has been termed the Cambrian Explosion, as there is suddenly a myriad of life forms without any precursors to show how they could have evolved, or even that they had time in which to evolve, from the earliest signs of microscopic life that are now being found in some lower levels. These early cambrian life forms are often described as being vastly more beautiful and on a grander scale than what we have left now. There is a host of species that dwarf the present living forms, in both size and complexity. There has been a continual loss of species, from earliest times, and we are probably loosing a hundred or so every year.
These aspects are the exact opposite of what evolution predicts, which is a gradual build up from the first simple life to bigger, better and more complex higher forms, by many small increments, or massive jumps, that by chance, always turn out to be logically sound, never a ridiculous outcome, thus defying the laws of probability. Just because there is a variety of life that can be listed in some suitable order doesn't mean they evolved in that order, or that similarities necessarily prove relatedness. Similarities, particularly in totally unrelated species could be due to the same designer reusing and modifying some aspect to be suitable for an application in another species. Consider the eyes of the octopus and human, very similar, with modifications because of the different conditions, dark and no UV radiation verses excessive light and UV radiation which would quickly damage the optic nerves, and obviously does in cases of "snow blindness" .

Claims of intermediates are very rare, and usually don't last long before being de-bunked by evolutionists themselves. All the intermediates pre-human to human have been reclassified to monkey/ape type or to human, but of course the evolutionists still use them as if true. Though there are many claims that intermediates are found, when you try to trace them back to some exacting scientific proof, you will find that it rests entirely on assumptions, based on the belief in evolution, but usually disputed by other evolutionists, and that the creation model probably is a much better explanation.

Millions of years?
Where radiometric tests have been done on deposits of known age the radiometric date is often out by so many millions of years that no radiometric dates should be believed. Usually only dates that happen to coincide with the date required by the evolution hypothesis are used, anything else is discarded as erroneous. Often remains of wood taken from deposits supposedly many million of years old still have radiocarbon which proves the deposit to be quite young, 50,000 years maximum.

World wide flood.
If the sea floor and the land surface, including mountains were leveled out there is enough water to cover the entire earth to a depth of 2.7km. With all that water how could we not have had a world wide flood? It would be a miracle if we didn't. However on the planet Mars where there is no water and little ice at the poles scientists claim huge rifts were formed by massive flooding, there is some inconsistency in their attitude. Their denial of a worldwide flood seems to be a psychological hedge against having to admit that something in the Bible is true.

While present geological processes may have operated at present rates for long periods of time, the advocates of this (creation) model contend that it is impossible to account for most of the important geological formations according to uniformitarian principles. These formations include the vast Tibetan Plateau, 750,000 square miles of sedimentary deposits many thousands of feet in thickness and now at an elevation of three miles; the Karoo Supergroup of Africa, which has been estimated by Robert Broom to contain the fossils of 800 billion vertebrate animals; the herring fossil bed in the Miocene shales of California, containing evidence that a billion fish died within a four-square mile area; and the Cumberland Bone Cave of Maryland, containing fossilized remains of dozens of species of mammals, from bats to mastodons, along with the fossils of some reptiles and birds including animals which now have accommodated to different climates and habitats from the Arctic region to tropical zones. Neither has the uniformitarian concept been sufficient to explain mountain building nor the formation of such vast lava beds as the Columbian Plateau in the northwest United States, a lava bed several thousand feet thick covering 200,000 square miles.
EVOLUTION: CHALLENGE OF THE FOSSIL RECORD
Duane T Gish, Ph.D. p50.

Email:- This page operated by Ken:- http://creationtheory.mysite.com/
Email kennyern@outlook.com    Tweet to @Kenny_E2       Tweet     Follow @Kenny_E2

You may copy pages provided you keep the URL and email address on all copies.
Go to Index Page.

           Other people's web pages.

http://www.trueorigin.org/Good scientific articles related to the above article, on: